Fast distributed almost stable marriages

In their seminal work on the Stable Marriage Problem, Gale and Shapley describe an algorithm which finds a stable matching in $O(n^2)$ communication rounds. Their algorithm has a natural interpretation as a distributed algorithm where each player is represented by a single processor. In this distributed model, Floreen, Kaski, Polishchuk, and Suomela recently showed that for bounded preference lists, terminating the Gale-Shapley algorithm after a constant number of rounds results in an almost stable matching. In this paper, we describe a new deterministic distributed algorithm which finds an almost stable matching in $O(\log^5 n)$ communication rounds for arbitrary preferences. We also present a faster randomized variant which requires $O(\log^2 n)$ rounds. This run-time can be improved to $O(1)$ rounds for "almost regular" (and in particular complete) preferences. To our knowledge, these are the first sub-polynomial round distributed algorithms for any variant of the stable marriage problem with unbounded preferences.Comment: Various improvements in version 2: algorithms for general (not just "almost regular") preferences; deterministic variant of the algorithm; streamlined proof of approximation guarante

Recursive Sketching For Frequency Moments

In a ground-breaking paper, Indyk and Woodruff (STOC 05) showed how to compute $F_k$ (for $k>2$) in space complexity O(\mbox{\em poly-log}(n,m)\cdot n^{1-\frac2k}), which is optimal up to (large) poly-logarithmic factors in $n$ and $m$, where $m$ is the length of the stream and $n$ is the upper bound on the number of distinct elements in a stream. The best known lower bound for large moments is $\Omega(\log(n)n^{1-\frac2k})$. A follow-up work of Bhuvanagiri, Ganguly, Kesh and Saha (SODA 2006) reduced the poly-logarithmic factors of Indyk and Woodruff to $O(\log^2(m)\cdot (\log n+ \log m)\cdot n^{1-{2\over k}})$. Further reduction of poly-log factors has been an elusive goal since 2006, when Indyk and Woodruff method seemed to hit a natural "barrier." Using our simple recursive sketch, we provide a different yet simple approach to obtain a $O(\log(m)\log(nm)\cdot (\log\log n)^4\cdot n^{1-{2\over k}})$ algorithm for constant $\epsilon$ (our bound is, in fact, somewhat stronger, where the $(\log\log n)$ term can be replaced by any constant number of $\log$ iterations instead of just two or three, thus approaching $log^*n$. Our bound also works for non-constant $\epsilon$ (for details see the body of the paper). Further, our algorithm requires only $4$-wise independence, in contrast to existing methods that use pseudo-random generators for computing large frequency moments